Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.



Go to last post Go to first unread
#1 Posted : Friday, June 17, 2022 4:42:51 AM(UTC)

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/17/2022(UTC)
Posts: 1
Location: UK

I have noticed that the default list of header to be signed are as below.
sender, from, to, cc, date, subject, mime-version, content-type, message-id, references, in-reply-to

reply-to is missing from the list. Is there a reason this is missing, or just an oversight?

reply-to is included in the recommended list within the DKIM RFC

Is there any reason I should not add this header into the signed list manually?


#2 Posted : Tuesday, June 21, 2022 2:10:43 AM(UTC)

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administrators
Joined: 11/11/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,149

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 54 time(s) in 54 post(s)
No problem, you can add Reply-To in the header list, there is no negative effect.
But it is not a MUST, sometimes the transport agent will change the reply-to header based on the user rule, that is why we don't use it by default.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.735 seconds.


© All Rights Reserved, AIFEI Software Limited & AdminSystem Software Limited.